Two investment subsidiaries of market maker DWF Labs have sued crypto custodian BitGo in London's High Court, alleging it breached contracts tied to discounted token purchases, CoinDesk reported on Oct. 9. Everything below is an allegation made by the plaintiffs, as described by CoinDesk. Neither side had responded to CoinDesk's request for comment when the article was published.

Note on the headline figure: CoinDesk's headline says $141 million; its article text says DWF is seeking $114 million in damages. The article doesn't explain the difference, and PumpReport has not been able to reconcile it. We cite both.

Prices are rounded figures as reported by CoinDesk and describe allegations, not findings. A price decline over a period does not by itself show what caused it.

What DWF alleges

The plaintiffs are DWF Maas, based in the British Virgin Islands, and Falcon Digital, based in Panama, which CoinDesk describes as investment subsidiaries of DWF Labs. They say they agreed to buy Falcon Finance (FF) and ESPORTS tokens from BitGo at a discount, subject to a three-month lock-up period. They allege BitGo breached those contracts by selling the tokens before the lock-ups expired, and that those sales caused prices to fall. DWF told CoinDesk the tokens were moved to exchanges roughly two months before the first unlock, and that the discount "was conditional on the tokens remaining locked." DWF said it raised the issue with BitGo in April and May and that, with no undertaking forthcoming, court action became necessary.

The price moves cited

CoinDesk reports that FF fell from 8 cents at the start of the lock-up in early March to about 7 cents by late April, and that ESPORTS fell from about 28 cents in mid-March to 7 cents in early June. By simple arithmetic on those rounded figures, ESPORTS' decline is about three-quarters and FF's roughly an eighth, but token prices can fall for many reasons, and the lawsuit's claim that BitGo's alleged sales caused the declines is exactly what a court would have to decide. The article does not report BitGo's side.

What a token lock-up is, and why discounted deals depend on one

A lock-up is a contractual or technical restriction that stops a holder from selling tokens until a set date. In discounted over-the-counter deals, the lock-up is what lets the seller offer a lower price: the buyer accepts illiquidity in exchange for a discount, and the seller (or the project) gets a buyer who can't immediately dump supply into the market. If tokens subject to a lock-up reach exchanges early, the deal's core bargain is in question, and other holders face unexpected supply. That, in outline, is why lock-up breaches are treated as a serious market-structure issue — whether or not any specific claim here is ultimately upheld.

What to watch

The next developments would be BitGo's response, any court filings or defenses, and any statement clarifying the damages figure. CoinDesk's article references a Financial Times report from the previous Friday, and also contains background about DWF's other dealings; we link to CoinDesk's piece for that context rather than repeating allegations unrelated to this lawsuit. Related reading on how forced selling and sudden supply move prices is in What Is a Crypto Liquidation?

Fast answers

Why is DWF Labs suing BitGo?

Two DWF Labs investment subsidiaries, DWF Maas and Falcon Digital, allege in London's High Court that BitGo breached contracts by selling FF and ESPORTS tokens before three-month lock-ups expired, causing prices to fall. These are allegations as described by CoinDesk; BitGo had not responded when the article was published.

How much is DWF seeking: $141 million or $114 million?

CoinDesk's headline says $141 million, while its article text says DWF is seeking $114 million in damages. The article does not explain the difference, and PumpReport has not reconciled the two figures.

What is a token lock-up?

A lock-up is a restriction that prevents a holder from selling tokens until a set date. In discounted over-the-counter token deals, the buyer typically accepts the lock-up in exchange for a lower price. DWF told CoinDesk the discount here was conditional on the tokens remaining locked.

Has BitGo responded?

Neither DWF nor BitGo had responded to CoinDesk's request for comment when its article was published on Oct. 9, 2026. PumpReport has not seen a BitGo statement.

Allegations only. Not financial or legal advice. This article reports claims made in a court filing as described by CoinDesk. A lawsuit's allegations are not findings of fact, and the defendant has not been reported to have responded. PumpReport has not seen the filing itself and does not assert that any party acted improperly. Token prices cited are rounded figures as reported and do not by themselves establish causation. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset. Consult a qualified legal or financial advisor before making decisions.
Go Deeper

Sources: CoinDesk (Jamie Crawley, Oct. 9, 2026), citing a Financial Times report. All claims are allegations as described by CoinDesk.